Spider Iris Software 24 BEST
Spider Iris Software 24 === https://tiurll.com/2tfdgp
Live market data is provided over the Internet. The software offers advanced charting and comprehensive technical analysis tools. The charting quality and features are equally matched with the best charting softwares available in the world today. Spider IRIS+ is a single all-inclusive platform without the high price tag.
IRIS est fier d'annoncer la sortie des NOUVEAUX logiciels Readiris PDF 22 et IRIScan Desk 6 ! IRIS a le plaisir d'annoncer son tout nouveau gestionnaire de PDF, Readiris PDF 22, le logiciel le plus puissant jamais développé pour la conversion, la création, la modification, la combinaison et la signature électronique de documents PDF. Convertissez vos documents PDF en format Microsoft Office et vos documents Office en PDF !En savoir plus sur ces produits
Many of these reported cases of phenotypic convergence involve pigmentation (see Hubbard et al., 2010), notably in the color of skin (Miller et al., 2007; Gross et al., 2009), fur (Hoekstra et al., 2006; Kingsley et al., 2009; Steiner et al., 2009), or plumage (Mundy, 2005). In primates, blue iris pigmentation has been documented in four different lineages. In humans (Homo sapiens), the prevalence of the trait increases with latitude from 24 to 55% in European populations (Zanetti et al., 1996; Laeng et al., 2007); it has also been observed in populations with European admixture (Frudakis et al., 2007). In Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata), which are endemic to the broad-leaved deciduous and evergreen forests of Japan (Oi, 2002; Abe et al., 2005), blue or intermediate iris color has been observed at frequencies of 12 to 19% in colonies on Shodoshima and Kyushu islands (Yamagiwa, 1979; Zhang and Watanabe, 2007). Blue irises have also been reported in the brown spider monkey (Ateles hybridus, formerly Ateles belzebuth hybridus; Hernandez-Camacho and Cooper, 1976; Konstant et al., 1985) and closely related Colombian black spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi or fusciceps, subspecies rufiventris; Hernandez-Camacho and Cooper, 1976; Defler et al., 2004), which inhabit evergreen, semi-deciduous, and montane seasonal forests in Colombia, Panama, and Venezuela (Mondolfi and Eisenberg, 1979; Defler et al., 2004). Although the prevalence of this trait in these species has not been extensively documented, approximately 13% of a population of brown spider monkeys in north central Colombia has blue irises (R. Rimbach and A. Link, personal communication). In contrast to these other species, all blue-eyed black lemurs (Eulemur flavifrons, formerly Eulemur macaco flavifrons) have blue irises, whereas in the most closely related species, the black lemur (Eulemur macaco, formerly Eulemur macaco macaco), all individuals have brown irises (Mittermeier et al., 2006). These sister species inhabit primary and secondary tropical sub-humid forests in a narrow range in northwestern Madagascar (Rabarivola et al., 1991; Andrianjakarivelo, 2004; Randriatahina and Rabarivola, 2004) and hybridize across part of this range (Rabarivola et al., 1991). Given that almost all other primates have brown or yellow irises (Kobayashi and Kohshima, 2001), blue iris pigmentation can be inferred to be a derived trait that has arisen independently on these lineages.
Beyond these broad strokes, the extent of iris pigmentation variation within and between species has not been characterized. In particular, it is not yet clear whether the reported blue irises represent the same phenotype in all species. Demonstrating such similarity is important, as if the derived phenotypes were different, we would anticipate the involvement of distinct genetic loci. Thus, mapping the traits would not provide additional information with regard to evolutionary constraint. Quantitative measures of iris pigmentation variation, recently demonstrated to be associated with genetic variation in humans (Liu et al., 2010a; Edwards et al., 2012), provide a way of evaluating phenotypic similarity across species.
Our understanding of the genetic basis of blue iris pigmentation in humans can inform hypotheses regarding the genetic basis in other primates. In humans, several coding sequence mutations and deletions of coding regions in OCA2 cause oculocutaneous albinism, or severely reduced pigmentation of the hair, skin, and irises (Manga and Orlow, 1999; Oetting and King, 1999), whereas regulatory SNP rs12913832 has a more moderate influence on hair and skin phenotypes (Sulem et al., 2007; Branicki et al., 2009). If dramatic pigmentation reduction in skin or fur were deleterious in other primates, we may expect blue irises to evolve via regulatory mutations in these species as well. Notably, SNP rs12913832 lies within a stretch of 410 bp demonstrating strong conservation among mammals; thus, this region is a strong candidate for variants with the capacity to influence OCA2 expression. Bradley et al. (2009) sequenced 166 bp of the orthologous region and found no fixed differences between the two lemur species. They identified one variant that was polymorphic within the blue-eyed black lemurs but not the black lemurs sequenced, a pattern that could be suggestive of this variant or a linked site contributing to pigmentation differences.
Several lines of evidence support the idea that blue irises have fitness effects in humans. The rarity of observation of the phenotype in nature, in combination with observed deleterious pleiotropic consequences in humans (Eagle Jr, 1994; Imesch et al., 1997; Metallinos et al., 1998; Santschi et al., 1998; Yang et al., 1998; Smith et al., 2000; Pingault et al., 2010) and domesticated animals (Juraschko et al., 2003; Geigy et al., 2007; Hauswirth et al., 2012), suggests that some benefit would be required to overcome purifying selection against these pleiotropic effects. Population genetic evidence also supports recent positive selection at the locus responsible for the majority of the phenotypic variation in humans (Voight et al., 2006; Donnelly et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2012). Although the mechanism driving this population genetic signature is unclear, direct selection for blue irises to improve short wavelength perception (Bornstein, 1973; Laeng et al., 2007), selection for light skin pigmentation to increase vitamin D absorption (see, e.g., Jablonski and Chaplin, 2000; Parra, 2007), and sexual selection (Darwin, 1871; Diamond, 1992; Aoki, 2002; Frost, 2006; Laeng et al., 2007) may have played a part.
Independent plots for each species or group showing quantitative phenotypic variation in the CIE L*a*b* color system, with color representing visible color (as in Fig. 1). (A) Japanese macaques, (B) blue-eyed black lemurs and black lemurs, (C) brown spider monkeys, and (D) humans.
Our comparison of the phenotypic variation across species suggests hypotheses about the genetic basis of blue irises in Japanese macaques and blue-eyed black lemurs. In humans, iris color varies continuously (e.g., Frudakis et al., 2007; Edwards et al., 2012); however, our perception of this spectrum of variation has led us to categorize iris color into discrete classes: e.g., blue, green, and brown (Kayser et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2010a). The genetic basis of iris color variation in humans reflects both these perceived discrete categories (>80% of the variation in blue vs. brown can be explained by a single mutation) and the underlying continuous nature of the phenotype (several additional loci with more modest effects have been identified; see, e.g., Sulem et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2010a). In Japanese macaques, as in humans, iris color variation is continuous in CIE L*a*b* space (Fig. 2A). This may suggest that one or a few loci have strong effect, producing the perceived blue/brown distinction, with additional genetic or environmental modifiers generating a continuous spectrum between these extremes. In contrast, phenotypic variation is discontinuous between the photographed blue-eyed black lemurs and black lemurs; one or more fixed genetic differences contributing to iris color differences between species could explain this discontinuity. Alternatively, the derived trait may result from a combination of changes in several genes, thus allowing specific variants to segregate within blue-eyed black lemurs. Additional phenotypic data from brown spider monkey populations might enable predictions about the genetic architecture of iris color variation in this species as well.
The observation of a variant just upstream of the human causal variant in the sample of blue-eyed black lemurs, but not the sample of black lemurs, raises the possibility that this variant or one linked to it influences iris pigmentation. Although this variant cannot produce blue irises on its own, it could do so in combination with variation at other loci. Such a complex genetic basis for iris pigmentation could explain the intermediate phenotype observed in hybrids between blue-eyed black lemurs and black lemurs (Meyers et al., 1989; Rabarivola et al., 1991).
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Duke Lemur Center, and in particular, Erin Ehmke, David Haring, and Sarah Zehr for assistance with black lemur samples and photographs; members of the Center for Human Evolution Modeling Research at the Primate Research Institute of Kyoto University, volunteers at the Shodoshima Monkey Park, Athma Pai, and Joe Pickrell for assistance with Japanese macaque samples and photographs; Melissa Edwards and Esteban Parra for providing human photographs; Eckhard Heymann, Andres Link, and Rebecca Rimbach for providing information about and photographs of brown spider monkeys; Supriya Kadam, Scott Smemo, and Nora Wasserman for help in the lab; Lian Huan Ng and Matthew Stephens for suggestions about how to summarize phenotypic information from photographs; Xiang Zhou for assistance with GEMMA; Audrey Fu, Heejung Shim, and Bryce van de Geijn for discussion of likelihood ratio testing with mixture models; Emily Davenport and Dagan Loisel for helpful discussions about working with fecal DNA samples; and Daniel Matute, George Perry, Jr., Laure Ségurel, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. The collection of human photographs was approved by the University of Toronto Health Sciences Research and Ethics Board and all participants were provided written informed consent. All work with Japanese macaques complied with protocols approved by the Animal Care and Use Guideline of Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University. Brown spider monkey research was authorized by the Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible in Colombia and adhered to the legal requirements of Colombia. Lemur data were collected under protocols approved by the Duke Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and the Duke Lemur Center (approval nos. A053-09-02 and BS-8-11-1, respectively). This work was supported by the Cooperation Research Program of Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University. M.P. is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Early Career Scientist. 153554b96e